Clone story 3
From the home notes of Stink :
~~~
Mr. Carrington does not use traditional cloning techniques. He incorporates a mixture of Northern-influenced mischangism and self-doubling. I will now let the criminal explain his crime, further absolving the jury of unnecessary feelings of guilt:
"I wear the rings, but don't need them. The center of my face is made blurred and unctuous from correct hygiene. My hand can pass through. There is a way to test-tweak the strands inside. It takes some training. My initial doubles lacked shape. Over time, I could get them more defined. Now I've reached a crispness that offends eyes. It is possible to sharpen visuals until they injure. Neophytes beware : keep on the blur. When I pull out my hand (there is no need to grasp - the double will follow), I cast it aside and to the right. So as you know, if left-handed - throw still to right. Then I crown king the double."
There can be no mistaking the urgency of the crime. If it had been less rushed, perhaps we could have guilt. But as it stands in the testimony, speed of crime adversely affects necessity of guilt-of-jury.
Parenthetically, my father would often talk fondly of the "gilt o' jurri" he and his own father cultivated and removed during the Irish plane phase of this nation's child diversions. Both he and his father were roughly the same age at the time and equally underdeveloped so it was no surprise they would escape tasks by raising guilt. Back then, actual juries were not invented, as they are today. They were made of wood and smeared generously with whatever food was served at dinner.
There is a vital importance to Mr. Carrington's deed and its influence on youth today. It is rare that followers write individualized manifestos for their leaders. What a great man he is. Here is my manifesto for him:
"We will not tolerate gum-wire. It is a drug; a poison and she is ugly. Her blanket is not patterned to our liking. Revenge is ours."
Hope he likes it.
~~~
Mr. Carrington does not use traditional cloning techniques. He incorporates a mixture of Northern-influenced mischangism and self-doubling. I will now let the criminal explain his crime, further absolving the jury of unnecessary feelings of guilt:
"I wear the rings, but don't need them. The center of my face is made blurred and unctuous from correct hygiene. My hand can pass through. There is a way to test-tweak the strands inside. It takes some training. My initial doubles lacked shape. Over time, I could get them more defined. Now I've reached a crispness that offends eyes. It is possible to sharpen visuals until they injure. Neophytes beware : keep on the blur. When I pull out my hand (there is no need to grasp - the double will follow), I cast it aside and to the right. So as you know, if left-handed - throw still to right. Then I crown king the double."
There can be no mistaking the urgency of the crime. If it had been less rushed, perhaps we could have guilt. But as it stands in the testimony, speed of crime adversely affects necessity of guilt-of-jury.
Parenthetically, my father would often talk fondly of the "gilt o' jurri" he and his own father cultivated and removed during the Irish plane phase of this nation's child diversions. Both he and his father were roughly the same age at the time and equally underdeveloped so it was no surprise they would escape tasks by raising guilt. Back then, actual juries were not invented, as they are today. They were made of wood and smeared generously with whatever food was served at dinner.
There is a vital importance to Mr. Carrington's deed and its influence on youth today. It is rare that followers write individualized manifestos for their leaders. What a great man he is. Here is my manifesto for him:
"We will not tolerate gum-wire. It is a drug; a poison and she is ugly. Her blanket is not patterned to our liking. Revenge is ours."
Hope he likes it.
